Break the Universe · Printable worksheet
Evidence versus model audit
For each universe, trace what is observed in our universe, what the toy assumes, what it computes and what the renderer illustrates.
Name / group:
Class / period:
1 · Prediction and reason
The strongest claim I think the evidence supports is…
2 · Observed model outcome
| Case | Observed evidence | Model rule / assumption | Computed output | Visual encoding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Very smooth beginning · Q = 5×10⁻⁷2dwf5gub54vgontdw3Launch in classroom mode → | ||||
| Weak scaffold · χ = 0.102dwf5gub5fzgo2udw3Launch in classroom mode → | ||||
| Weak electromagnetism · α = 0.402dwf5gub5fzgont8d3Launch in classroom mode → |
3 · Evidence from the run → Claim
1.Why does the low-Q case report its particular first failure?
2.Where do the slider window and fate output disagree?
3.Rewrite one overconfident claim with a model qualifier.
Exit ticket
This run shows ___ within the Tuner; it does not directly show ___.